Sunday, March 27, 2011

The Nuclear Debate Explained [Simply]

Our local UKIP fucknut is at it again.

Look Nick, you are an Accuntant, not a Physicist, please stick to counting beans. For your edification and education.

We already have a reliable Nuclear Fusion Reactor located at a safe distance - it's called the Sun. This is from where we get ALL our energy, including fossil fuels, which are in effect just a battery storage device for Nuclear Fusion energy captured from the Sun over millennia.

What you are proposing is Nuclear Fission which is highly volatile, has a tendency to create violent explosions, is NOT at a safe distance, has a problem with it's exhaust materials and is FUCKING expensive. Does that sound like Curry - sorry!

Click on the image to enlarge.

13 comments:

  1. Haha what an absolute crock of shit, Nuclear Power is the safest power, what sort of mad scaremongering crap from Green idiots hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have published and am leaving the comment above just to prove my point.

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima

    You will not be surprised to hear that the events in Japan have changed my view of nuclear power. You will be surprised to hear how they have changed it. As a result of the disaster at Fukushima, I am no longer nuclear-neutral. I now support the technology. George Monbiot

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm interesting, but Wind power doesn't work, and coal is dirty, so until there is a better solution ill be favouring Nuclear. The Japan earthquake really Impressed me, those Nuclear Reactors have held up really well despite not being designed to, and the radation released is far below deemed anywhere damaging, I hadn't thought of Nuclear before but now I really think it is the best way forward.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My oh my, I appear to have hit a nerve of the Deniers.

    "Yet, as far as we know,..." - George Monbiot

    It's early days.....

    http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/81375.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bril, nuclear power is a waste of money, best remind them of that fact, time and again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. They don't like it up em, Captain Mainwaring.

    Nuclear Power – No Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, I am a physicist, thanks very much.

    Where are all these violent explosions that nuclear fission has a tendency to create? Or do you mean 'potential to create'?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well, you're certainly not Nick Jones, Anon.

    ReplyDelete
  10. sHORT 10 POINT SUMMARY OF THE CASE AGAINST np HER: http://www.greenhealth.org.uk/Nuclear.htm

    ReplyDelete
  11. oOPS. As they said at Windscale/sellafield. And TNI. And Chernobyl. And Fukushima.

    ReplyDelete
  12. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/mar/31/double-standards-nuclear

    Mobiot strikes back!

    ReplyDelete