The Nuclear Debate Explained [Simply]

Our local UKIP fucknut is at it again.

Look Nick, you are an Accuntant, not a Physicist, please stick to counting beans. For your edification and education.

We already have a reliable Nuclear Fusion Reactor located at a safe distance - it's called the Sun. This is from where we get ALL our energy, including fossil fuels, which are in effect just a battery storage device for Nuclear Fusion energy captured from the Sun over millennia.

What you are proposing is Nuclear Fission which is highly volatile, has a tendency to create violent explosions, is NOT at a safe distance, has a problem with it's exhaust materials and is FUCKING expensive. Does that sound like Curry - sorry!

Click on the image to enlarge.

I'm Voting Conservative

No Fly Zone

"RT @JohnRentoul: Stop The War Coalition will be marching this afternoon in opposition to a UN resolution that has just stopped a war" - Wes Streeting

"Very glad I successfully proposed disaffiliating NUS from stop the war coalition as president. Ramshackle, deluded, SWP front group." - Wes Streeting

Global Warning

Republicans to Repeal Laws of Physics

"The climate operates based on the laws of physics, not the laws of Montana or the United States of America."

[Hattip Jim via Twitter]

Conference Reignites Climate Change Debate

“‘Climate Change?’ is being organised by Philip Foster MA, a retired clergyman and prominent climate change sceptic, author and one of the initiators of the successful [sic!] ‘Copenhagen Climate Challenge’ in December 2009, together with his associate, Reverend Ian Walters.”

No doubt these two clerics will be applying the same rigorous evidence based techniques that they apply to their own matters ecclesiastical?

Side by Side